|
|
Thomas Claffey, M.D. received his undergraduate degree at Boston College and his MD at the University of Vermont in 1970. He completed his residency training at the University of Iowa.
Michael Albaum, M.D. received his undergraduate degree at Yale University and his MD at the University of Pittsburgh. He completed his residency training at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.
We interviewed two Maine doctors to get their insights and views about how clinical office systems make great care happen. Michael Albaum, M.D., practices internal medicine and is Medical Director of the PrimeCare Group in Southern Maine. Thomas Claffey, M.D., practices internal medicine in Portland and is Medical Director of Internet Group.
What changes in healthcare do patients need to understand to get safe, quality care?Dr. Albaum: In the past, doctors primarily treated short term problems such as infections or injuries. These problems were typically over quickly for better or worse. Today, more patients suffer from chronic conditions such as diabetes, heart disease, asthma. In part this reflects the aging of the population; in part it reflects improvements in healthcare allowing us to effectively treat a greater range and severity of problems. Managing chronic illnesses requires a new relationship between doctor and patient. Our goal is to provide the patient with the tools to better self manage their health problems. The role of the physician is that of a facilitator, educator or coach. We also have more information about what interventions are effective. Clinical trials have shown us which treatments are helpful and which aren't for a wide range of conditions. For many chronic conditions Clinical Guidelines outline the current state of the art care. Doctors, nurses, and patients need to work together as a team to ensure that the newest information is available and that recommendations that have shown proven benefit are being acted on. Dr. Claffey: The whole thrust of medical care delivery going forward over the next 10 to 15 years is going to be to move the responsibility for health from the provider to the patient. Patients need to understand that a lot of the outcome of their health care depends on what they do. Patients have to get adult about this. They can't come to the system and say, I want to be able to do whatever I want, and when I get sick, I want you to fix it in two days, for no cost, and I want the result to be perfect all the time. I think it's marvelous that people are out there learning about the diseases they have, finding out what they need to do, and finding out what questions they ought to be asking. So what's the role of clinical office systems in all this?Dr. Albaum: My vet sends out a card every year that the cats need their shots. My dentist sends out a card telling me that I'm due for a cleaning. Those are examples of systems. An example of an office system would be tracking who hasn't been in for a physical in the last year or two. It would be a reminder of what an individual patient is due for at the time that I see them in the exam room, as well as broader reporting about where my whole population of patients with a given diagnosis stand.. At my group, PrimeCare, we recently created a computer network so we can communicate with every doctor, nurse, front desk person and office manager. That's step one. Step two is going to allow us to start collecting data about how we're doing with disease management, and bring everybody up to a better degree of compliance with best practices. Doctors are dependent on information for everything we do, and yet we've been one of the last groups to incorporate information technology. A doctor's paper chart is not a very good tool for rapidly determining if a patient's care is optimal. It doesn't allow me to know what's happening with people that aren't right in front of me in the office. : What I ask of an office system is: Do the tools I have meet my needs and my patients' needs for information? Dr. Claffey: My view is that the whole disease management thing is about setting up and making operational, systems that care for patients. You really ought to be interested in whether or not the physicians you're dealing with are part of the process, are interested in advancing chronic disease management in a way that standardizes how the care is delivered. In Maine, I think, we haven't developed a systems-based approach to care. We have to start some place and measure the results. You might call a practice site manager and say: "I have diabetes or I have heart failure. What systems do you have in place to help me manage those things in addition to my visit with the doctor?" |
How will paying so much attention to clinical office systems help patients get better care?Dr. Albaum: One of the things I can tell you is that a computer network makes it easier for people to start doing things in a collaborative way. For example, in the past, our obstetricians, our doctors who deliver babies, didn't have a lot of information at their finger tips when they were on call. We have a system now where they can take it from the computer network and download it onto palm pilots they have at home(information about each pregnant woman such as their due dates, any complications they've had in the past, problems with the pregnancy. So when a patient calls in the middle of the night, our doctors have the information they need to provide good care. One of our initial quality improvement efforts was a low back pain project. All our patients with low back pain got the same information from everyone who cared for them. And we got them to specialty care (to a spine center) faster when they needed it. The success of this project got all our providers to see how helpful these systems could be. Now we're also setting up a diabetes database that's going to have all our patients with diabetes in it. It's going to allow us to see how good a patient's control is, who is overdue for a test or an office visit, and how our entire population of diabetics is doing over time Dr. Claffey: I think the best part of this (the MHMC systems project) is that the insurance community and the employer community and the provider community are sitting down around the table and trying to work out how you make the system better - how you make care better for employees, and that involves a lot of complex things. It involves changing processes among the providers. It means changing thinking on the part of the insurance companies and the employers. I think for me, the importance of this process is that we're all doing it. We're having these discussions and we're chewing these things through. What about the future and the role of patients in shaping that future?Dr. Albaum: Here's what I hope a really good office system will be able to do for me and my patients down the road, maybe in 5 years time:
It takes a lot of time to learn these systems. It's a quality improvement cycle. But we all need to understand that things aren't necessarily as good as they could be. I think patients let their doctors off the hook for a lot. I think patients should ask what clinical office systems are in place to ensure compliance with best practices. Currently, I think it's rare that patients ask that. Dr. Claffey: My view of this project and the whole thrust around disease management is that I think we're going to incent providers and payers and employers to set up systems that will standardize the delivery of care for chronic disease. So patients will be more likely to get care based on the best research wherever they go. We're starting from point A, where we have patients being taken care of in a number of different ways. Hopefully, providers can offer more resources to patients so they understand what they have to do and then get involved in making more decisions. It's going to take some time to get these things done. In other words, even though we're embarked on a diabetes management project, it's going to take us time to put together a registry, figure out who the diabetic patients are, make sure they're all getting hemoglobin A1c tests done and then work on whether these are at the right level. That doesn't happen in the blink of an eye. My view is that the important thing is that people are participating. Patients looking for healthcare could look for those medical practices that are interested and committed to doing whatever's necessary to make sure they're delivering a quality product. What I would imagine would happen over a period of time is that employers will be able to identify groups of providers who have demonstrated a commitment to quality healthcare and are putting in place systems that will work. |